Review Process

The journal is supported by an experienced editorial team and a qualified peer-review panel that ensures the academic quality, originality, and integrity of submitted manuscripts. All submissions undergo initial editorial assessment to evaluate relevance, structure, clarity, ethical compliance, and scholarly merit, after which suitable manuscripts are forwarded for expert peer review. Editors and reviewers work together to ensure that articles align with the journal’s aims and scope, contribute original knowledge to the field, and meet established publishing standards. The peer-review process plays a critical role in validating research quality, checking originality and plagiarism, and providing constructive feedback to authors to improve the scientific and intellectual value of their work prior to publication.

Our editors are responsible for-

1. Identify the article: The article's veracity will be examined by our distinguished peer-review panel, which will also uphold and enhance the reputation and profile standards of the Journal. They must guarantee the excellent caliber of the manuscripts received for the article assignment.
2. Cross-check the article pattern: After correcting any inaccurate information in the article, our editors should make sure that the editing is finished promptly and that the author receives helpful feedback on the submitted article papers. We make sure that the article content is on the right track and complies with the standards set by our journal.
3. EPH journal standards: We are liable for any little complexities or discrepancies that may come up throughout the article submission process and we provide the author with tactics, rules, and techniques for doing so.
4. Organize Virtual Meetings: We frequently plan video conferences and meetings that are both groups- and individually focused. We discuss the goal and significance of the journals and invite potential contributors to think about submitting papers to the publication agency.
5. Protecting Confidentiality of the Article: We offer the author a detailed set of instructions for putting together and submitting his manuscripts. We check the submitted article to make sure it adheres to the standards and policies of our journal. Our expert panel makes sure that there are no authorship conflicts and that the author's work is kept confidential from other authors.
6. Article’s decision: The text is reviewed by our editorial staff, who fix any spelling, punctuation, or grammatical mistakes they find. For the research piece to be successful, they should help the author incorporate their thoughts. Editors will use their methodology to make a decision regarding whether or not to continue with the research article.
7. Identifying the article: Since it is his responsibility to verify the veracity of the article content, the editor's primary duty is to uphold and enhance the journal's profile and reputation. They must make sure that the article job only receives top-notch manuscripts.
8. Check the article structure: The editor must make sure that the article is edited promptly after any potential errors have been fixed and that the author has received helpful feedback on the articles they have submitted. The editor also makes sure that the submitted article is complete and that its illustrations, formatting, and references comply with requirements for international databases-indexed journals. Any unethical behavior on the part of the authors and reviewers will be pointed out by the editor, looked into, and corrected. The author should be handled fairly, politely, objectively, and honestly, according to editors.
9. Target Journal rules and guidelines: The Editor is in charge of handling any small complexities and discrepancies that surface during the article submission process, and it is their responsibility to communicate these to the author. holds the right to format the article as they see fit, including editing, deleting, or even adding pertinent information. They may also provide any additional manuscripts or reference materials the author requests.
10. Hold conferences: In addition to the responsibilities listed above, the editor should speak at conferences to discuss the goals and importance of the journals and to encourage potential authors to think about submitting their work to the publication agency. The target journals' indexes that the article should be listed in will be determined by the editor.
11. Protect the Confidentiality: In accordance with the timeline established with the publisher, the editor timely submits the peer-reviewed article for each issue. The editor needs to make it very clear what the author should do to prepare and submit their work. The editor must ensure that the received article complies with the requirements of the target journal. The editor should make sure that there is no conflict of interest with the authorship while also protecting the authors’ confidentiality.
12. Correct the errors if any: If there are any spelling, punctuation, or grammatical errors, the editor should read the entire piece carefully and make the necessary corrections. They must assist the author in incorporating their ideas into the research piece for it to be successful. Editors have their own methods for deciding whether or not to proceed with a research article when it comes to making decisions.
13. Builds trust: Peer reviews increase the reliability of the research article. In order to assess the caliber of the journal and uphold scientific integrity in journal publication, it will make it easier to identify the characteristics of the article content. Peer review of an article guarantees quality control, longevity, and content that is only pertinent to the target journals. The authors strengthen their writing communication and provide fresh workshop concepts while receiving helpful criticism from others in their field of expertise.
14. Removal of fraudulent content: Since the first review is conducted by peers, an article without peer review cannot be processed into the journal. Peer review, therefore, aids in the elimination of any fraudulent works that are plagiarised from other journals. They are regarded as a crucial informational resource and a means of evaluating the quality of journal publications. Peers help authors by adding value to the contributions of the author's article material, as well as by helping them comprehend and interpret the author's experience and assisting them in putting a valid article into print.
15. Target Journal Oriented: The author is required to confirm that the article standards adhere to those set forth by the target periodicals. They encourage the authors to build the essay in a positive and productive way. Peer review's primary goal is to uphold the target journal's credibility, openness, objectivity, confidentiality, security, integrity, and effectiveness. It also offers a platform for comments and analysis to determine the article's quality and ranking in the target journals.