VALIDATING MEASURES IN BUSINESS RESEARCH: PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

Authors

  • Fredrick Aila
  • Benjamin Ombok

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53555/eijse.v1i2.35

Keywords:

Postgraduate Studies, School of Business and Economics, Reliability, Measurement, Business Studies

Abstract

Instrument validity, though at the heart of quantitative business research, has not been adequately treated by novice researchers and advisors alike, potentially invalidating otherwise good research. This paper reviews validity in business research and presents practical implications for its assessment. The paper finds immediate use among novice researchers and advisors in assessing instrument validity and by extension entire research validity. As a result, it is hoped quality of researches will improve warranting scrutiny by researchers in the fields of business studies and beyond.

References

. Aila, F.O. (2014). Effect of consumer attitudes, consumer characteristics and biosecurity principles on consumer preferences for indigenous chickens in Kisumu City, Kenya. An unpublished PhD Thesis, Department of Business Administration, Maseno University.

. Bollen K. A. (1990). Political democracy: Conceptual and measurement traps. Studies in Comparative International Development, Spring (1), 7-24.

. Bolliger, D. U., & Inam, F. A. (2012). Development and validation of the online student connectedness survey (OSCS). The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13(2), 41-65.

. Burton, L. J, & Mazerolle, S. M. (2011). Survey instrument validity part I: Principles of survey instrument development and validation in athletic training education research. Athl Train Educ J. 6(1):27-35.

. Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: design and analysis issues for field settings. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.

. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. (4th ed.). London: Sage Publications, Inc.

. de Vaus, D. A. (2013). Surveys in social research. (5th ed.). London: Rutledge.

. DeVellis, R. F. (2012). Scale development: Theory and applications. (3rd ed.). London: Sage Publications, Inc.

. Drost, E.A. (2011). Validity and Reliability in Social Science Research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105-123.

. Hair, J. F. Jr., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective. (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.

. Kimberlin, C. L. & Winterstein, A. G. (2008). Validity and reliability of measurement instruments used in research. Am J Health-Syst Pharm. 65, 2276-84.

. Nargundkar, R. (2003). Marketing research: Text and cases. (2nd ed.). New Delhi: Tata McGraw-Hill.

. Netemeyer, R. G., Bearden, W. O., & Sharma, S. (2003). Scaling procedures: Issues and applications. London: Sage.

. Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2012). Research methods for business students. (3rd ed.) London: Prentice Hall-Financial Times.

. Sekaran, U. & Bougie, R. (2010). Research methods for business: A skill building approach. (5th ed.). New York: John Wiley and Sons.

. Slavec, A. & Drnovsek, M. (2012). A perspective on scale development in entrepreneurship research. Economic and Business Review, 14(1), 39-62.

. Thanasegaran, G. (n.d.). Reliability and validity issues in research. Department of Management & Marketing, Faculty of Economics & Management, Universiti Putra Malaysia. Accessed from www.upm.edu.my on 15th May 2015.

. Trochim, W. M. (2006). The research methods knowledge base. (2nd ed.). Internet www page, at URL:<http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/> (version current as of October 20, 2006). Accessed on 15 May 2014.

. Turocy, P. S. (2002). Survey research in athletic training: The scientific method of development and implementation. J Athl Train. 37(Suppl 4), S174-S179.

. Zikmund, W. G., Babin, B. J., Carr, J. C., & Griffin, M. (2010). Business research methods. (8th ed.). Mason, OH: South-Western/Cengage Learning.

Downloads

Published

2015-06-27