“SEISMIC RESPONSE OF INFILL FRAME G+20 BUILDING WITH SHEAR WALL FOR LIFT USING SAP 2000 SOFTWARE”

Authors

  • Datta P. Khade Student of ME Structure, Civil Engineering Department, PES College of Engineering, BAMU University Aurangabad, India
  • Rahul D. Pandit Assistant Professor, Civil Engineering Department, PES College of Engineering, BAMU University Aurangabad, India
  • Dr. Abhijeet P. Wadekar Professor, Civil Engineering Department, and Principle, PES College of Engineering, BAMU University Aurangabad

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53555/eijse.v4i3.168

Keywords:

Masonry Infill, Shear Wall, Pushover analysis, displacement, drift, stiffness, Hinge formations

Abstract

This paper presents an analysis on performance-based seismic evaluation of G+20 RC frame Building with masonry infill (MI) and shear wall (SW) for lift using Non-linear Static Pushover Analysis with SAP2000v14 software for two different models i.e., Model-1: RC bare frame and Model-2: RC frame with MI wall and SW for lift (Soft storey). Result indicates, maximum Displacement for Model-1 i.e., 0.3346m, Model-2 gave displacement of 0.0718m respectively. These results clearly show, the stiffening in Model-2 is increased to 78.54% compared to Bare Frame.

                                                                                                                                      

References

. Venkata Sairam Kumar, Surendra Babu.R, Usha Kranti.J; “Shear walls – A review”, International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, Vol. 3, Issue 2, February 2014.

. Konuralp Girgin and Kutlu Darılmaz; “Seismic Response of Infilled Framed Buildings Using Pushover Analysis”, ARI The Bulletin of the Istanbul Technical University, VOLUME 54, NUMBER 5.

. Qiuhong Zhao and Abolhassan Astaneh-Asl, M; “Cyclic Behaviour of Traditional and Innovative Composite Shear Walls”, Journal Of Structural Engineering © Asce / February 2004 / 271-284.

. E. Giuriani, M. and A. Gubana, M; “Underground Box Structure as a Foundation for Shear Walls in Seismic Resistant Buildings”, Journal Of Structural Engineering © Asce / April 2007 / 559-566.

. Vikas Govalkar, P. J. Salunke, N. G. Gore; “Analysis of Bare Frame and Infilled Frame with Different Position of Shear Wall”, International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering (IJRTE) ISSN: 2277-3878, Volume-3 Issue-3, July 2014.

. Prof. Milind V. Mohod; “Pushover Analysis of Structures with Plan Irregularity”, IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering (IOSR-JMCE) e-ISSN: 2278-1684,p-ISSN: 2320-334X, Volume 12, Issue 4 Ver. VII (Jul. - Aug. 2015), PP 46-55.

. P. P. Chandurkar, Dr. P. S. Pajgade; “Seismic Analysis of RCC Building with and Without Shear Wall”, International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER) Vol. 3, Issue 3, May-June 2013, pp-1805-1810 ISSN: 2249-6645.

. Mr. Syed Owaise Showkath Peer, Khalid Nayaz Khan; “Seismic Vulnerability of RC Buildings by Considering the Effect of Shear Wall”, International Journal of Scientific Research, Volume 3, Issue 9, September 2014, ISSN No 2277 – 8179

. Ashok Thakur, Arvinder Singh; “Comparative Analysis of a Multi-storeyed Residential Building with and Without Shear Wall using STADD Pro., International Journal of Recent Research Aspects ISSN: 2349-7688, Vol. 1, Issue 1, June 2014, pp. 54-57.

. Dhileep M, Trivedi A and Bose P R, “Behaviour of high frequency modal responses in nonlinear seismic analysis”, International Journal of Civil and Structural Engineering, Volume 1, No 4, 2011.

. A. Shuraim and A. Charif, “Performance of Pushover procedure in Evaluating the Seismic Adequacy of Reinforced Concrete Frame” 7th Saudi Engineering Conference.

. Xiao Kang ZOU and Chun Man CHAN, “Seismic Drift Performance Based Design Optimization of Reinforced Concrete Buildings”, 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, B.C. Canada, August 1-6, 2004, Paper No.223.

. FEMA, Prestandard & Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, FEMA 356, 2000. Federal Emergency Management Agency, CA, USA.

. Chandrasekaran, Gupta, VA run; “Pushover Analysis of RC framed structures”, International Journal of Nonlinear Dynamics & Chaos in Engineering System, Vol.4, No. 43, 2006, pp. 329-342.

. Diptesh Das and C.V.R Murty, “Brick masonry infills in seismic design of RC frame buildings Part II – Behavior”, The Indian Concrete Journal, July 2004, Vol. 78, No. 7, pp. 39-44.

. Subramanian and Jayaguru; “Behaviour of Partial Infill R.C. frames in Shear”, Teresa, Garcia; “The Captive and Short column effect”, Earthquake Spectra, Vol. 21, No. 1, 2005, pp. 141-160.

. IS 1893 (Part I), Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures, Part I: General provisions for buildings, fifth revision, Bureau of I.S., New Delhi, India, 2002.

. IS 456, Plain & R.C. - code of practice, fourth revision, Bureau of I.S., New Delhi, India, 2000.

. IS 875 (Part-1) – Code of practice for design loads (other than earthquake) for building and structures, Bureau of I.S., New Delhi, India, 1987.- for Dead load.

. IS 875 (Part-2) – Code of practice for design loads (other than earthquake) for building and structures, Bureau of I.S., New Delhi, India, 1987.- for Live load.

. IS13920 – Ductile detailing of Reinforced Concrete Structures subjected to Seismic forces – Code of practice, Bureau of I.S., New Delhi, India, 1993.

. ATC 40. Seismic Evaluation & Retrofitting of Concrete buildings, ATC40, 1996, Vol.1, Applied Technology Council, Washington, DC, USA.

Downloads

Published

2018-06-27

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 2 (2018): EPH - International Journal of Science And Engineering (ISSN: 2454 - 2016)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2018 EPH - International Journal of Science And Engineering (ISSN: 2454 - 2016)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.