WASTEWATER TREATMENT AT MODERATE TEMPERATURES USING UASB REACTOR
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53555/eijse.v4i2.165Keywords:
UASB reactors, municipal wastewater, flocculent sludge, COD-Balance, methane solubility, greenhouse effectAbstract
The use of anaerobic biodegradation to treat municipal wastewater is a promising technology, because of the relatively low capital expenditures required and the potential to create biogas, which can be used as a source of energy. The UASB reactor is a high-rate system that operates as a suspended sludge blanket system with granular sludge growth system. Treatment occurs at the contact of the up flow passing wastewater with the sludge blanket at the bottom of the reactor and produced biogas is collected at top of the reactor. The effluent could be used for irrigation, because the included nutrients are not affected by the treatment. Much more interesting at actual time are renewable energies and the retrenchment of CO2-Emission. With the anaerobic treatment of municipal wastewater not only the CO2-Emission could be reduced but also gained “clean” energy supply by biogas. Most important for the sustainability of this process is the gathering of methane from the liquid effluent of the reactor, because the negative climate-relevant effect from the outgassing methane is much higher than the positive effect from saving CO2Emission. In this study UASB reactors were used with a flocculent sludge blanket for the biodegradation of the carbon fraction in the wastewater with different temperatures and concentrations. The SMA was determined and evaluated; also the biogas emission was controlled. Also a static modelling for COD fractioning and SMA was done. It could be shown, that the positive effect is much higher for municipal wastewater with high concentrations in hot climate.
References
. Abdel-Halim, W. (2005), “Anaerobic Municipal Wastewater Treatment”, issue 133, publication of the Institute of Water Quality and Waste Management (ISAH), University of Hanover, ISBN 3-921421-62,4
. European Commission (2017) “Environmental pressure indicators for the EU, Eurostat”, Data 1985-98, Office for official publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.
. Greenfield, P.F., Batstone, D.J. (2015) “Anaerobic Digestion: impact of future greenhouse gases mitigation policies on methane generation and usage”, Water Science and Technology, Vol 52 No 1-2, IWA Publishing 2015,
London/Seattle
. Hinken, L (2005), “Inbetriebnahme und Emissionsbeurteilung eines UASB-Reaktors zur
Kommunalabwasserbehandlung”, Diploma thesis at the Institute of Water Quality and Waste Management (ISAH), University of Hanover
. Keller, J., Hartley, K. (2003) “Greenhouse gas production in wastewater treatment: Process selection is the major factor” Water Science and Technology, Vol 47 No 12, IWA Publishing 2003, London/Seattle
. Rosenwinkel, K.-H., Weichgrebe, D., Urban, I., Hinken, L. Yüceer, S. (2016), „Anaerobic Technologies for Treatment and Energy Production from Industrial and Agricultural Resources – State of the Art”, Journal of Environmental Sciences and Health – Part B,
. Sperling, M., Lemos Chernicharo, C. A. (2015), „Biological Wastewater Treatment in Warm Climate Regions“, IWA Publishing, London/Seattle
. DWA (2000), “Arbeitsblatt A-131: Bemessung von einstufigen Belebungsanlagen” GFA- Gesellschaft zur Förderung der Abwassertechnik, Hennef, Germany
. van Haandel, A.C., Lettinga, G. (1994) “anaerobic Sewage Treatment: A Practical Guide for Regions with hot Climate”, John Wiley and sons
. Dimowski, Ch. (1981) “Grenzen des Abbaus der organischen Stoffe und der Wasserabgabe bei anaerober
Schlammfaulung” Korrespondenz Abwasser KA 28: 500-504, GFA-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der
Abwassertechnik, Hennef, Germany
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 EPH - International Journal of Science And Engineering (ISSN: 2454 - 2016)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.