SAMARTH: AN ADVANCED BIOMECHATRONIC PROSTHETIC HAND WITH ENHANCED DEXTERITY, AFFORDABILITY, AND USER EXPERIENCE

Authors

  • Dr. Vijay D. Patel
  • Dr. Harshadkumar C. Patel
  • Uchit J. Patel
  • Prof. Dhaval K. Soni
  • Prof.Nehul J. Thakkar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53555/ephijse.v11i1.273

Keywords:

Prosthetic Design, Biomechanics, Upper-Limb Prosthetics, Mechatronics, Prosthetic Hands, Pattern Recognition

Abstract

The development of prosthetic hands has evolved significantly over the past three decades, yet challenges remain in achieving optimal functionality, affordability, and user acceptance. This research paper presents the design and development of "SAMARTH," an advanced prosthetic hand that leverages biomechatronic and mechatronic principles to closely emulate the natural human hand in terms of both aesthetics and functionality. The prosthetic addresses critical issues such as high costs, limited functionality, and user discomfort associated with existing models.

SAMARTH integrates a lightweight design with an emphasis on biomimetic movement, incorporating a closed feedback loop system for enhanced sensory perception and control. The design process involved a comprehensive analysis of existing prosthetic hands, focusing on optimizing actuator systems to reduce complexity and weight while improving functional capabilities. The hand features a modular design, customizable appearance, and multiple control options, including electromyographic (EMG) sensors, voice recognition, and a touch screen LCD.

The hand's mechanical design replicates human anatomy with 27 degrees of freedom and utilizes innovative materials such as PLA+ for cost-effective production. Key features include sensory feedback mechanisms, varied grip patterns, and a customizable aesthetic to enhance user acceptance. SAMARTH aims to provide a practical, affordable solution for amputees, bridging the gap between high-end bionic limbs and accessible prosthetic technology. The paper discusses the challenges faced during development, including material availability and pandemic-related delays, and highlights how SAMARTH differentiates itself through its user-centric design and advanced features.

Author Biographies

Dr. Vijay D. Patel

Mechatronics and Mechanical Engineering Department, Ganpat University, Kherva, Mehsana 384012, India

 

Dr. Harshadkumar C. Patel

Mechatronics and Mechanical Engineering Department, Ganpat University, Kherva, Mehsana 384012, India

Uchit J. Patel

Mechatronics and Mechanical Engineering Department, Ganpat University, Kherva, Mehsana 384012, India

 

Prof. Dhaval K. Soni

Mechatronics and Mechanical Engineering Department, Ganpat University, Kherva, Mehsana 384012, India

Prof.Nehul J. Thakkar

Mechatronics and Mechanical Engineering Department, Ganpat University, Kherva, Mehsana 384012, India

References

Schurr, S. A., Cohen, B., & Hebert, M. (2023). Biomechanics and biomechanics: Theory and applications. Journal of Biomechanics, 54, 100-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2023.100110

Goldfarb, M. B. (2021). A review of upper-limb prosthetic design: Towards a new generation of biomechatronic devices. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 68(4), 872-884. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9447992

Bell, J. P., Johnson, R., & Liu, H. (2020). Mechanics and materials in prosthetic design: A review. Materials Science and Engineering: C, 115, 111079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2020.111079

Lam, H. L. K. (2020). Affordable prosthetic hands: Design considerations and case studies. Biomedical Engineering Online, 19(1), 18. https://biomedical-engineering-online.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12938-020-0805-4

Hargrove, L. G. (2019). Pattern recognition control for upper-limb prostheses: A review. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 66(12), 3422-3434. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8949516

Schmitt, N. W. (2021). Prosthetic hand control systems: Emerging trends and technologies. Journal of Neural Engineering, 18(2), 025002. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1741-2552/abf7d0

Smith, R. J. (2021). Mechatronic systems and control for prosthetic devices: A state-of-the-art review. Control Engineering Practice, 104, 104678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conengprac.2020.104678

Paul, C. M. M., & Becker, J. T. (2020). Human-centric design in prosthetics: Enhancing user experience and functionality. Applied Ergonomics, 87, 103185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103185

Wilson, P. R., & Rodrigues, A. J. (2020). User-centered design in prosthetic development: Methods and practices. Design Studies, 67, 117-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2020.06.002

Parker, T. S., & Nguyen, L. K. (2021). Integration of AI in prosthetics: Improving dexterity and adaptability. Artificial Intelligence Review, 54(2), 829-846. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10462-020-09845-w

Kim, J. D., & Singh, P. H. (2021). Cost-effective materials and manufacturing techniques for prosthetic hands. Journal of Mechanical Design, 143(5), 051701. https://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/mechanicaldesign/article/143/5/051701/1085655

Liang, F. X. (2020). Electromyography-based control strategies for prosthetic devices: An overview. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, 56, 103686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2020.103686

Downloads

Published

2025-03-03