PRECISION MANUFACTURING IN AEROSPACE ENGINEERING USING ADVANCED ROBOTIC SYSTEMS

Authors

  • Durvaank Umakant Patel 10th Grade (High school), Aerospace Engineering, Aviation and Robotics, South Windsor High School, South Windsor, Connecticut, United States, 06074

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.67772/30q43713

Keywords:

aerospace manufacturing, robotic assembly, KUKA KR16, defect detection, YOLO11n, precision manufacturing

Abstract

Automated inspection and robotic process control of the manufacturing process are becoming more integral to the precision aerospace manufacturing process to ensure product quality and assembly consistency. In this study, a complementary framework based on two modules, a robotic fastener-process characterization module and an artificial-intelligence-based aircraft-defect-detection module, were developed. The first module involved analyzing 479 trials of the KUKA KR16 for aeronautical fastener-assemblies based on temporal kinematic and dynamic signals, engineering indicators, deviation measures, and supervised learning for assessment of the assembly outcome. The second module used a leakage-controlled YOLO11n workflow for dent, fastener damage and rupture detection, validation only model selection, locked testing, robustness analysis, bootstrapping uncertainty estimation and object-scale diagnostics and checkpoint-reproducibility controls. There was still the 3-class model with a Macro-F1 of 0.4127, but none of the engineering KPI families were of significance following FDR correction. The chosen YOLO11n-416 detector performed best with test precision of 0.8027, recall of 0.5612 and mAP50–95 of 0.2993, substantially compromised by the performance on the small defects. These results suggest the use of complementary evidence of process stability and quality verification, and not just a single performance measure, to assess the precision of the aerospace manufacturing industry. The framework lays the groundwork for a repeatable approach to the integration of robotic execution analysis with uncertainty-aware visual quality assessment without baseless claims of actual direct robotic-vision fusion or proven dimensional accuracy gains in production.

References

1. Ameri, R., Hsu, C. C., & Band, S. S. (2024). A systematic review of deep learning approaches for surface defect detection in industrial applications. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 130, 107717.

2. da Silva Santos, K. R., Villani, E., de Oliveira, W. R., & Dttman, A. (2022). Comparison of visual servoing technologies for robotized aerospace structural assembly and inspection. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 73, 102237.

3. Giardini Lahr, G. J., Segreto Silva, T. H., Moreira, G. R., Ajoudani, A., Boaventura, T., & Caurin, G. A. P. (2023). Robotic assembly data of threaded fasteners: Aeronautical collars (Version 1) [Dataset]. Mendeley Data. https://doi.org/10.17632/26674p3hvg.1

4. Hémono, P., Chabane, A. N., & Sahnoun, M. H. (2025). Multi objective optimization of human–robot collaboration: A case study in aerospace assembly line. Computers & Operations Research, 174, 106874.

5. Huang, B., Ding, Y., Liu, G., Tian, G., & Wang, S. (2024). ASD-YOLO: An aircraft surface defects detection method using deformable convolution and attention mechanism. Measurement, 238, 115300.

6. Jayasekara, D., Lai, N. Y. G., Wong, K. H., Pawar, K., & Zhu, Y. (2022). Level of automation (LOA) in aerospace composite manufacturing: Present status and future directions towards industry 4.0. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 62, 44-61.

7. Jha, S. B., & Babiceanu, R. F. (2023). Deep CNN-based visual defect detection: Survey of current literature. Computers in Industry, 148, 103911.

8. Kang, R., Hu, J., Shi, Z., Zhang, J., Li, Z., Li, Z., & Tian, W. (2025). A high-precision digital twin modeling approach for the serial-parallel hybrid drilling robot in aircraft assembly. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 94, 102986.

9. Kang, Y., Wang, T., Song, S., Li, G., & Chen, Y. (2024). Real-time modeling of the riveting process forces for aircraft panel structures. Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 124, 90-109.

10. Li, H., Hou, Z., Wang, C., & Lu, T. (2025). A review of automated aircraft skin defects detection. Measurement, 120019.

11. Li, H., Wang, C., & Liu, Y. (2025). Aircraft skin defect detection based on Fourier GAN data augmentation under limited samples. Measurement, 245, 116657.

12. Li, S., Zheng, P., Pang, S., Wang, X. V., & Wang, L. (2023). Self-organising multiple human–robot collaboration: A temporal subgraph reasoning-based method. Journal of manufacturing systems, 68, 304-312.

13. Meng, D. I. N. G., Boer, W. U., Juan, X. U., & Hongfu, Z. U. O. (2022). Visual inspection of aircraft skin: Automated pixel-level defect detection by instance segmentation. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 35(10), 254-264.

14. Shang, H., Sun, C., Liu, J., Chen, X., & Yan, R. (2023). Defect-aware transformer network for intelligent visual surface defect detection. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 55, 101882.

15. University of Technology Sydney. (2024). Aircraft Defect Detection Dataset [Open source dataset]. Roboflow Universe. Roboflow. https://universe.roboflow.com/university-of-technology-sydney-21uto/aircraft-defect-detection

16. Wang, B., Zhang, J., & Wu, D. (2025). Force–vision fusion fuzzy control for robotic batch precision assembly of flexibly absorbed pegs. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 92, 102861.

17. Wang, J., Xu, G., Yan, F., Wang, J., & Wang, Z. (2023). Defect transformer: An efficient hybrid transformer architecture for surface defect detection. Measurement, 211, 112614.

18. Zhang, Q., Zheng, S., Yu, C., Wang, Q., & Ke, Y. (2022). Digital thread-based modeling of digital twin framework for the aircraft assembly system. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 65, 406-420.

19. Zhang, R., Lv, J., Li, J., Bao, J., Zheng, P., & Peng, T. (2022). A graph-based reinforcement learning-enabled approach for adaptive human-robot collaborative assembly operations. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 63, 491-503.

20. Zhang, Z., Wang, Y., Zhang, Z., Wang, L., Huang, H., & Cao, Q. (2024). A residual reinforcement learning method for robotic assembly using visual and force information. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 72, 245-262.

21. Zhao, L., Li, X., Zhao, H., Zhang, J., & Ding, H. (2026). A comprehensive review of robotic assembly of aerospace components. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 88, 350-375.

22. Zheng, Y., Liu, W., Zhang, Y., Han, L., Li, J., & Lu, Y. (2025). Integration and calibration of an in situ robotic manufacturing system for high-precision machining of large-span spacecraft brackets with associated datum. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 94, 102928.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-30