OPTIMIZING MATERIAL REPLACEMENT STRATEGIES FOR ENHANCED STRENGTH PERFORMANCE OF SUSTAINABLE CONCRETE

Authors

  • Dr. Shikha Singh ASSISTANT(BTech, MBA,NET, PhD), Associate Professor, Management, Marketing and logistics Ajeenkya D Y Patil university, Pune Maharashtra, Pune 412105 https://orcid.org/0009-0006-6533-8661

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.67772/gq74r795

Keywords:

 sustainable concrete, material replacement, compressive strength, split tensile strength, recycled aggregates

Abstract

Sustainable concrete is an important pathway to decrease dependence on conventional cement and natural aggregates and to ensure adequate mechanical performance. This study compared various approaches for improving the strength performance of sustainable concrete by replacing materials. For the design, the experimental data consisted of five concrete conditions (conventional concrete, cement replacement, fine-aggregate replacement, coarse-aggregate replacement, and combined/all-material replacement), and a quantitative comparative design was used. The compressive strength and split tensile strength were obtained after 7, 14 and 28 days from three replicates for each curing age. The performance differences were analyzed using descriptive statistics, percentage improvement, one-way analysis of variance, post-hoc comparisons, and correlation analysis. The strength of all concrete groups was enhanced with the curing age. The combined material replacement gave the maximum compressive strength of 26.10 MPa at 28 days that shows a 24.26% improvement over the conventional concrete, and the split tensile strength of 4.46 MPa at 28 days that improves by 17.10% over the conventional concrete. There were significant differences in the compressive strength between replacement strategies at all curing ages, and significant differences in split tensile strength were also noted. The overall strength-performance index, which was normalized, also supported the condition of combined replacement as the strongest condition. These results show that it is possible to coordinate the replacement of several concrete constituents to improve the mechanical properties and allow more sustainable use of materials in the concrete industry.

 

References

1.Ahmad, J., Zhou, Z., Martínez-García, R., Vatin, N. I., de-Prado-Gil, J., & El-Shorbagy, M. A. (2022). Waste foundry sand in concrete production instead of natural river sand: A review. Materials, 15(7), 2365.

2.Akhtar, A., & Sarmah, A. K. (2018). Construction and demolition waste generation and properties of recycled aggregate concrete: A global perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 186, 262–281.

3.Behnood, A., & Golafshani, E. M. (2020). Machine learning study of the mechanical properties of concretes containing waste foundry sand. Construction and Building Materials, 243, 118152.

4.Chen, X., Zhang, D., Cheng, S., Xu, X., Zhao, C., Wang, X., Wu, Q., & Bai, X. (2022). Sustainable reuse of ceramic waste powder as a supplementary cementitious material in recycled aggregate concrete: Mechanical properties, durability and microstructure assessment. Journal of Building Engineering, 52, 104418.

5.Golafshani, E. M., Behnood, A., Hosseinikebria, S. S., & Arashpour, M. (2021). Novel metaheuristic-based type-2 fuzzy inference system for predicting the compressive strength of recycled aggregate concrete. Journal of Cleaner Production, 320, 128771.

6.Guo, M., Gong, G., Yue, Y., Xing, F., Zhou, Y., & Hu, B. (2022). Performance evaluation of recycled aggregate concrete incorporating limestone calcined clay cement (LC3). Journal of Cleaner Production, 366, 132820.

7.Hafez, H., Kurda, R., Kurda, R., Al-Hadad, B., Mustafa, R., & Ali, B. (2020). A critical review on the influence of fine recycled aggregates on technical performance, environmental impact and cost of concrete. Applied Sciences, 10(3), 1018.

8.Hassan, A., Arif, M., & Shariq, M. (2019). Use of geopolymer concrete for a cleaner and sustainable environment–A review of mechanical properties and microstructure. Journal of Cleaner Production, 223, 704–728.

9.Homayoonmehr, R., Ramezanianpour, A. A., & Mirdarsoltany, M. (2021). Influence of metakaolin on fresh properties, mechanical properties and corrosion resistance of concrete and its sustainability issues: A review. Journal of Building Engineering, 44, 103011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103011

10.Kumar, K. A., Rajasekhar, K., & Sashidhar, C. (2022). Experimental research on the effects of waste foundry sand on the strength and micro-structural properties of concrete. Civil Engineering Journal, 18(10), 2172–2189.

11.Likes, L., Markandeya, A., Haider, M. M., Bollinger, D., McCloy, J. S., & Nassiri, S. (2022). Recycled concrete and brick powders as supplements to Portland cement for more sustainable concrete. Journal of Cleaner Production, 364, 132651.

12.Liu, Z., Liu, S., Takasu, K., Zhang, Y., Wang, Y., & Suyama, H. (2024). Development of sustainable self-compacting concrete: Replacement of sand with municipal solid waste incineration ash molten slag and recycled fine aggregate. Construction and Building Materials, 450, 138674.

13.Majhi, R. K., & Nayak, A. N. (2019). Bond, durability and microstructural characteristics of ground granulated blast furnace slag based recycled aggregate concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 212, 578–595.

14.Majhi, R. K., Nayak, A. N., & Mukharjee, B. B. (2020). Characterization of lime activated recycled aggregate concrete with high-volume ground granulated blast furnace slag. Construction and Building Materials, 259, 119882.

15.Mamirov, M., Hu, J., & Cavalline, T. (2022). Geometrical, physical, mechanical, and compositional characterization of recycled concrete aggregates. Journal of Cleaner Production, 339, 130754.

16.Muduli, R., & Mukharjee, B. B. (2020). Performance assessment of concrete incorporating recycled coarse aggregates and metakaolin: A systematic approach. Construction and Building Materials, 233, 117223.

17.Munir, M. J., Kazmi, S. M. S., Wu, Y.-F., Lin, X., & Ahmad, M. R. (2022). Development of a novel compressive strength design equation for natural and recycled aggregate concrete through advanced computational modeling. Journal of Building Engineering, 55, 104690.

18.Nedeljković, M., Visser, J., Šavija, B., Valcke, S., & Schlangen, E. (2021). Use of fine recycled concrete aggregates in concrete: A critical review. Journal of Building Engineering, 38, 102196.

19.Parashar, A., Aggarwal, P., Saini, B., Aggarwal, Y., & Bishnoi, S. (2020). Study on performance enhancement of self-compacting concrete incorporating waste foundry sand. Construction and Building Materials, 251, 118875.

20.Priyadarshini, M., & Giri, J. P. (2022). Use of recycled foundry sand for the development of green concrete and its quantification. Journal of Building Engineering, 52, 104474.

21.Revilla-Cuesta, V., Fiol, F., Perumal, P., Ortega-López, V., & Manso, J. M. (2022). Using recycled aggregate concrete at a precast-concrete plant: A multi-criteria company-oriented feasibility study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 373, 133873.

22.Sandhu, R. K., & Siddique, R. (2022). Durability performance of self‐compacting concrete made with waste foundry sand. Structural Concrete, 23(2), 722–738. https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.202100164

23.Shmlls, M., Abed, M. A., Horvath, T., & Bozsaky, D. (2023). Sustainability framework of recycled aggregate concrete produced with supplementary cementitious materials. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 14(8), 102036.

24.Singh, R., Nayak, D., Pandey, A., Kumar, R., & Kumar, V. (2022). Effects of recycled fine aggregates on properties of concrete containing natural or recycled coarse aggregates: A comparative study. Journal of Building Engineering, 45, 103442.

25.T, N. P. durai. (2023). Data set for Publication in Data in brief. 1. https://doi.org/10.17632/p2w6rf3gs7.1

26.Tam, V. W., Soomro, M., & Evangelista, A. C. J. (2018). A review of recycled aggregate in concrete applications (2000–2017). Construction and Building Materials, 172, 272–292.

27.Wang, J., Che, Z., Zhang, K., Fan, Y., Niu, D., & Guan, X. (2023). Performance of recycled aggregate concrete with supplementary cementitious materials (fly ash, GBFS, silica fume, and metakaolin): Mechanical properties, pore structure, and water absorption. Construction and Building Materials, 368, 130455.

28.Xie, T., Yang, G., Zhao, X., Xu, J., & Fang, C. (2020). A unified model for predicting the compressive strength of recycled aggregate concrete containing supplementary cementitious materials. Journal of Cleaner Production, 251, 119752.

29.Zhu, L., Ning, Q., Han, W., & Bai, L. (2022). Compressive strength and microstructural analysis of recycled coarse aggregate concrete treated with silica fume. Construction and Building Materials, 334, 127453.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-26