SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF SKEW CURVED BRIDGES FOR ZONE 4 SEISMOLOGY

Authors

  • Om Mishra Student, Department of Civil Engineering, BBDITM, Lucknow, India
  • Pratyush Mishra Student, Department of Civil Engineering, BBDITM, Lucknow, India
  • Priyansh Gupta Student, Department of Civil Engineering, BBDITM, Lucknow, India
  • Raghav Pal Student, Department of Civil Engineering, BBDITM, Lucknow, India
  • Ashwani Kumar Pandey Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, BBDITM, Dr. A. P. J. Abdul Kalam Technical University, Lucknow, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69980/tbxxp341

Keywords:

Seismic Analysis, Bridge Engineering, Earthquake Engineering, Nonlinear Time History , Analysis, Skew Curved Bridges, Seismic Isolation Systems

Abstract

Due to the complex behavior of bridges at this level of seismic failure, skewed-curved bridges constitute a severe challenge to structural engineering. They are different from straight bridges in that the combined form of these two curves and angles results in a clear gap between the center of mass and the center of rigidity. So that gives the rock a "pinball" effect in an earthquake. In zones like Zone 4, which experience much severe ground movement, these bridges encounter issues such as excessive deck rotations, pounding between decks and abutments, and risk of falling off their supports. Using Nonlinear Time History Analysis (NLTHA), a new approach is proposed for understanding how such structures react dynamically, with particular emphasis given to their curvature radius and effect on performance. Curvature and skew angles push up the shear forces on piers and cause bigger movement in expansion joints. Following IS 1893:2002 guidelines, the study identifies some key failure modes, such as the "kick" effect at abutments. Its focus is to draw attention to demand for some type of the latest seismic isolation or restraint system to prevent collapse in earthquake-prone regions. With the transitions (if it doesn't sound boring): the author alters styles and breaks from established patterns.

References

1.Komatsu, S., and Nakai, H. (1966). The studies on free vibration of a curved girder bridge. Japan.

2.Chu, K. H., and Pinjarkar, S. G. (1971). Analysis of horizontally curved box girder bridges. Journal of the Structural Division, ASCE, 97(ST10), 1481–1501.

3.Heins, C. P., Jr., and Bell, L. C. (1972). A Fourier series slope-deflection technique for curved girder bridge systems. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 98(ST1), 1–20.

4.Fam, A. R. M. (1972). Analysis of curved box-girder bridges using the finite element method. Proceedings of the 4th Canadian Congress of Applied Mechanics, Montreal, Canada, 297–298.

5.Corrado, J. A., and Yen, B. T. (1973). Failure tests of rectangular model steel box girders. Journal of the Structural Division, ASCE, 99(ST7), 1453–1472.

6.Buchanan, J. D., Yoo, C. H., and Heins, C. P., Jr. (1974). Experimental investigation of a curved box beam bridge. Journal of the Structural Division, ASCE, 100(ST11), 2271–2290.

7.Aslam, M., and Godden, W. G. (1975). Model studies of multicell curved box-girder bridges. Journal of Engineering Mechanics Division, ASCE, 101(3), 207–222.

8.Spence, R. J. S. (1975). The strength of single-cell concrete box girders of deformable cross- section. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, 59(4), 743–765.

9.Rabizadeh, R. O., and Shore, S. (1975). Dynamic analysis of curved box girder bridges. Journal of the Structural Division, ASCE, 101(ST9), 1865–1884.

10.Heins, C. P., Jr., and Oleinik, J. C. (1976). Finite difference analysis of curved box beam bridges. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 102(ST1), 1–20.

11.Scordelis, A. C., and Larsen, P. K. (1977). Ultimate strength of curved reinforced concrete box girder bridges. Journal of the Structural Division, ASCE, 103(ST9), 1771–1790.

12.Heins, C. P. (1978). Box girder bridge design: State of the art. Engineering Journal, AISC, 15(4), 130–145.

13.Inukai, G. J., Yen, B. T., and Fisher, J. W. (1978). Stress history of a curved box girder. Fritz Engineering Laboratory Report No. 386.8, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA.

14.Heins, C. P., and Humphreys, R. S. (1979). Model studies of curved steel box girders. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 105(ST7), 1423–1440.

15.Heins, C. P., and Lee, W. H. (1981). Field test of a curved box-girder bridge. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 107(ST2), 267–284

16.Davis, R. E., and Bon, V. D. (1981). Analysis of curved concrete box girder bridges. Federal Highway Administration Report No. FHWA-RD-81-078.

17.Heins, C. P., and Sheu, F. H. (1981). Computer-aided design of curved box girder bridges. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 107(ST11), 2121–2139.

18.Heins, C. P., and Sheu, F. H. (1982). Design/analysis of curved box girder bridges. Computers & Structures, 15(1), 1–10.

19.Arizumi, Y., Hamada, S., and Oshiro, T. (1983). Design considerations for curved composite girders in road bridges. Proceedings of the Japan Society of Civil Engineers, 1983(334), 1–10.

20.Seible, F., and Scordelis, A. C. (1984). Nonlinear analysis of reinforced concrete box girder bridges. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 110(3), 545–561.

21.Fleming, J.P., & Holt, E.C. (1981). Finite-element analysis of horizontally curved box- girder bridges. Journal of the Structural Division, ASCE, 107(4), 699–715. Available at: https://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/JSDEAG.0005798. Journal

22.Huo, X.S., & Zhang, H. (2008). Design issues related to horizontally curved steel box- girder bridges. of Bridge Engineering, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084 0702(2008)13:5(512). ASCE, 13(5), 512–519.

23.Zellner, W.C., & Schelling, D.R. (1993). Load distribution in curved box girder bridges. Transportation Research Record, No. 1393, 103–112. Transportation Research Board. Journal 24. Tong, M., & Liu, Y. (2004). Live load distribution in horizontally curved steel I-girder bridges. of Bridge Engineering, ASCE, 9(5), 467–475. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084 0702(2004)9:5(467).

24.Tang, P., Fanous, F., & Saiidi, M. (2006). Finite-element modeling of curved and skewed concrete box-girder bridges. Journal of Bridge Engineering, ASCE, 11(5), 577–586. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2006)11:5(577).

25.Dicleli, M., & Bruneau, M. (1995). Seismic evaluation of steel box girder bridges with unequal column heights. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 24(2), 215–232. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290240206.

26.Buckner, C.D., & Barker, R.M. (1997). Design considerations for curved steel I-girder bridges. National Cooperative Highway Research Program Report 368. Transportation Research Board. bridges. girder Journal

27.White, D.W., Barker, M.G., & Kuchta, D.M. (2007). Shear lag in curved and skewed steel I of Bridge Engineering, 0702(2007)12:6(677). ASCE, 12(6), 677–686. of https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084

28.Barth, K.E., & White, D.W. (1998). Live-load distribution for curved steel I-girder bridges. Journal Structural https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733 Engineering, ASCE, 124(4), 428–435.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-08